C++ PATCH for c++/91740 - ICE with constexpr call and ?: in ARRAY_REF
Paolo Carlini
paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Thu Sep 12 09:08:00 GMT 2019
Hi again,
On 12/09/19 11:03, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/09/19 23:15, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> --- gcc/cp/pt.c
>> +++ gcc/cp/pt.c
>> @@ -26709,7 +26709,7 @@ build_non_dependent_expr (tree expr)
>> Â Â Â if (TREE_CODE (expr) == COND_EXPR)
>> Â Â Â Â Â return build3 (COND_EXPR,
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â TREE_TYPE (expr),
>> -Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0),
>> +Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â build_non_dependent_expr (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0)),
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1)
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ? build_non_dependent_expr (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1))
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â : build_non_dependent_expr (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0))),
>
> Looks like we would end up unnecessarily calling
> build_non_dependent_expr three times instead of two: probably is very
> cheap, probably the code is cleaner this way but I'm a little annoyed
> at this anyway, for the record ;)
Sorry, I misread the code: normally TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1) isn't
NULL_TREE thus we are fine.
Paolo.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list