[PATCH 2/4] The main m68k cc0 conversion

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
Tue Nov 26 08:04:00 GMT 2019


Hi Bernd!

On 11/26/19 2:44 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I overlooked a difference in the 68881 vs coldfire patterns when I
> combined them. They use different suffixes for register compares (I only
> spotted the different constraints).
> 
> The following seems to fix the assembler failures. I cannot properly
> test Coldfire however due to lack of hardware.

Angelo Dureghello (CC'ed) does active kernel development work on ColdFire and
he might be able to help with testing on the platform. He also created two
open-source ColdFire SBCs [1, 2].

I do have multiple ColdFire boards myself, but they are currently not set
up and it would take me some time to get them running as I have never used
them before.

Adrian

> [1] http://sysam.it/cff_amcore.html
> [2] http://sysam.it/cff_stmark2.html

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list