[PATCH 2/4] The main m68k cc0 conversion
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Mon Nov 25 13:51:00 GMT 2019
On Nov 25 2019, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/25/19 12:26 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Nov 24 2019, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Whew, I think I have it. One tst instruction eliminated when it
>>> shouldn't have been:
>>>
>>> move.w %a4,%d0
>>> - tst.b %d0
>>> - jeq .L352
>>> + jeq .L353
>>>
>>> And the reason - that's a movqi using move.w. The following should fix
>>> it.
>>
>> Apparently that also fixed the testsuite regressions.
>
> I still wish I knew how you managed to reproduce those.
It's undefined behaviour, so you can get all kinds of random results.
The binary diff clearly shows the missing tstb insns.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list