[PATCH 1/4] MSP430: Disable TM clone registry by default

Jozef Lawrynowicz jozef.l@mittosystems.com
Sun Nov 24 17:55:00 GMT 2019


On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 10:10:51 -0700
Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 11/24/19 7:20 AM, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:11:23 -0700
> > Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 11/7/19 2:34 PM, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:  
> >>> Given that MSP430 is a resource constrained, embedded target disabling
> >>> transactional memory by default is a good idea to save on code size in
> >>> the runtime library.
> >>>
> >>> It can still be enabled by passing --enable-tm-clone-registry (although as far
> >>> as I understand the feature is fundamentally incompatible with MSP430 given
> >>> reliance on libitm, lack of thread support without an OS and the memory
> >>> limitations of the device.
> >>>     
> >> I'm not a huge fan of making the default configurations behave
> >> differently.  But I can also see how something like TM in particular
> >> isn't of much interest in the embedded space (hell, it's having trouble
> >> getting real traction in the server space as well).
> >>
> >> May be a reasonable path forward is to add the configury bits, keep TM
> >> on by default and create a different msp target which disables this stuff?  
> > 
> > Ok fair enough, what would an acceptable form for a new target triplet look
> > like? "msp430-*-elfbare"?  
> Yea, that seems reasonable.
> 
> > 
> > Since we're into stage 3 now I'll look at doing this for GCC 11.  
> I'd seriously consider letting this into gcc-10.  It's going to be well
> isolated and it's an iteration of something you posted before the
> stage1->stage3 transition.  Your choice if you want to try and pull it
> together quickly for gcc-10.

Ok great, I will aim to get something together ASAP.

Thanks,
Jozef
> 
> Jeff
> 



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list