[PATCH 0/6] Implement asm flag outputs for arm + aarch64
Richard Sandiford
richard.sandiford@arm.com
Wed Nov 13 08:39:00 GMT 2019
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:
> On 11/12/19 9:21 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Apart from the vc/vs thing you mentioned in the follow-up for 4/6,
>> it looks like 4/6, 5/6 and 6/6 are missing "hs" and "lo". OK for
>> aarch64 with those added.
>
> Are those aliases for two of the other conditions? They're not in the list
> within the pseudocode for ConditionHolds in the ARM ARM. Which is what I was
> documenting to support...
Yeah, hs==cs and lo==cc. But I think they're commonly used, and are the
natural choice if you're testing the result of an unsigned comparison.
Richard
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list