[PATCH 3/5] Reapply all revisions mentioned in LOCAL_PATCHES.

Martin Liška mliska@suse.cz
Tue Nov 5 19:17:00 GMT 2019


On 11/5/19 7:41 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
>> libsanitizer/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2019-11-05  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
>>
>> 	* asan/asan_globals.cpp (CheckODRViolationViaIndicator): Reapply from
>> 	LOCAL_PATCHES.
>> 	(CheckODRViolationViaPoisoning): Likewise.
>> 	(RegisterGlobal): Likewise.
>> 	* asan/asan_interceptors.h (ASAN_INTERCEPT___CXA_RETHROW_PRIMARY_EXCEPTION): Likewise.
>> 	(defined): Likewise.
>> 	* asan/asan_mapping.h: Likewise.
>> 	* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp (defined): Likewise.
>> 	* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mac.cpp (defined): Likewise.
>> 	* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp (defined): Likewise.
>> 	* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h: Likewise.
>> 	* sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace.cpp (GetCanonicFrame): Likewise.
>> 	* tsan/tsan_rtl_ppc64.S: Likewise.
>> 	* ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp (__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_cfi_bad_icall): Likewise.
>> 	(__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_cfi_bad_icall_abort): Likewise.
>> 	* ubsan/ubsan_handlers.h (struct CFIBadIcallData): Likewise.
>> 	(struct CFICheckFailData): Likewise.
>> 	(RECOVERABLE): Likewise.
>> 	* ubsan/ubsan_platform.h: Likewise.
> 
> just noticed that this ChangeLog entry is partially bogus: at least
> those (defined) entries are clearly wrong, probably generated by some
> simplistic script?

You are right, I used contrib/mklog script. For the next time, I'll not
generate the ChangeLog file.

Martin

> 
> 	Rainer
> 



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list