[PATCH 3/5] Reapply all revisions mentioned in LOCAL_PATCHES.
Martin Liška
mliska@suse.cz
Tue Nov 5 19:17:00 GMT 2019
On 11/5/19 7:41 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>> libsanitizer/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2019-11-05 Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
>>
>> * asan/asan_globals.cpp (CheckODRViolationViaIndicator): Reapply from
>> LOCAL_PATCHES.
>> (CheckODRViolationViaPoisoning): Likewise.
>> (RegisterGlobal): Likewise.
>> * asan/asan_interceptors.h (ASAN_INTERCEPT___CXA_RETHROW_PRIMARY_EXCEPTION): Likewise.
>> (defined): Likewise.
>> * asan/asan_mapping.h: Likewise.
>> * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cpp (defined): Likewise.
>> * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mac.cpp (defined): Likewise.
>> * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp (defined): Likewise.
>> * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.h: Likewise.
>> * sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace.cpp (GetCanonicFrame): Likewise.
>> * tsan/tsan_rtl_ppc64.S: Likewise.
>> * ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp (__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_cfi_bad_icall): Likewise.
>> (__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_cfi_bad_icall_abort): Likewise.
>> * ubsan/ubsan_handlers.h (struct CFIBadIcallData): Likewise.
>> (struct CFICheckFailData): Likewise.
>> (RECOVERABLE): Likewise.
>> * ubsan/ubsan_platform.h: Likewise.
>
> just noticed that this ChangeLog entry is partially bogus: at least
> those (defined) entries are clearly wrong, probably generated by some
> simplistic script?
You are right, I used contrib/mklog script. For the next time, I'll not
generate the ChangeLog file.
Martin
>
> Rainer
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list