[PATCH] Fix 2 clang warnings.
Thu Jun 27 19:53:00 GMT 2019
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:16 AM Martin Sebor <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 6/27/19 8:03 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Hi.
> > This reduces 2 warnings reported by clang.
> > Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
> > Ready to be installed?
> > Thanks,
> > Martin
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > 2019-06-27 Martin Liska <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > * edit-context.c (test_applying_fixits_unreadable_file): Do not
> > use () for a constructor call.
> > (test_applying_fixits_line_out_of_range): Likewise.
> > * ggc-page.c (free_page): Use (char *) for %p printf format
> > argument.
> > ---
> > gcc/edit-context.c | 4 ++--
> > gcc/ggc-page.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> Just as a side note:
> diff --git a/gcc/edit-context.c b/gcc/edit-context.c
> index d3246ab0334..93d10664ae9 100644
> --- a/gcc/edit-context.c
> +++ b/gcc/edit-context.c
> @@ -1639,7 +1639,7 @@ static void
> test_applying_fixits_unreadable_file ()
> const char *filename = "this-does-not-exist.txt";
> - line_table_test ltt ();
> + line_table_test ltt;
> linemap_add (line_table, LC_ENTER, false, filename, 1);
> location_t loc = linemap_position_for_column (line_table, 1);
> I'm guessing the warning above is about declaring a function
> returning line_table_test rather than declaring an object of
> the type. (It would be helpful to show those warnings when
> fixing them. A small test case confirms it's -Wvexing-parse:
> warning: empty parentheses interpreted as a function declaration.)
> This is a common mistake to make so it would be a useful
> warning to add to GCC as well. And in fact, I see at least
> one request for it in Bugzilla: 25814 (with the related
Realistically, if it's worth fixing any warning that clang outputted
and that GCC doesn't..... then perhaps the right fix is to add the
warning to GCC. Or, if it's there but not in -Wall, add it to -Wall.
You're pointing out this specific case, but there've been several of
these patches that are all different.
More information about the Gcc-patches