C++ PATCH for c++/90825 - endless recursion when evaluating sizeof
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Tue Jun 11 12:37:00 GMT 2019
On 6/11/19 7:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 09:59:46PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> This test segvs since r269078, this hunk in particular:
>>
>> @@ -4581,8 +4713,9 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
>> break;
>>
>> case SIZEOF_EXPR:
>> - r = fold_sizeof_expr (t);
>> - VERIFY_CONSTANT (r);
>> + r = cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, fold_sizeof_expr (t), lval,
>> + non_constant_p, overflow_p,
>> + jump_target);
>> break;
>>
>> In a template, fold_sizeof_expr will just create a new SIZEOF_EXPR, that is the
>> same, but not identical; see cxx_sizeof_expr. Then cxx_eval_constant_expression
>
> Not always, if it calls cxx_sizeof_expr, it will, but if it calls
> cxx_sizeof_or_alignof_type it will only if the type is dependent or VLA.
>
> So, I'd think you should call cxx_eval_constant_expression if TREE_CODE (r)
> != SIZEOF_EXPR, otherwise probably *non_constant_p = true; is in order,
> maybe together with gcc_assert (ctx->quiet); ? I'd hope that if we really
> require a constant expression we evaluate it in !processing_template_decl
> contexts.
Makes sense. Also, cxx_sizeof_expr should probably only return a
SIZEOF_EXPR if the operand is instantiation-dependent.
Jason
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list