[PATCH 1/2] Come up with function_decl_type and use it in tree_function_decl.

Marc Glisse marc.glisse@inria.fr
Tue Jul 2 17:15:00 GMT 2019


On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Martin Liška wrote:

> After the discussion with Richi and Nathan, I made a place in tree_function_decl
> and I rebased the original Dominik's patch on top of that.

So, last time there were some questions about the legality of this 
transformation. Did you change the exact set of functions on which this is 
applied? Or has there been a clarification in the standard saying that 
this is ok? (or were we mistaken the first time to believe that there 
might be an issue?)

-- 
Marc Glisse



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list