[C++ Patch] Locations related grokdeclarator tweak
Paolo Carlini
paolo.carlini@oracle.com
Mon Jan 21 17:38:00 GMT 2019
Hi,
On 21/01/19 18:22, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/18/19 6:13 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> a tweak to typespec_loc, where the existing conditional turns out to
>> be just a special case of the full min_location that we want in order
>> to do the right thing for testcases like diagnostic/trailing1.C.
>> Tested x86_64-linux.
>
> This is OK, but I don't think we want to keep messing with diagnostic
> locations now that we're in stage 4. This isn't a regression fix, is it?
I agree, isn't a regression fix and probably we don't want to (further
;) mess with locations in stage 4. In any case, I'm essentially done
with most of the low hanging fruits, I continued for a while with what I
had ready... Anyway, that said, what do you think, shall I schedule this
one for next Stage 1?
Thanks! Paolo.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list