[Patch] [arm] Fix 88714, Arm LDRD/STRD peepholes
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Mon Feb 11 11:08:00 GMT 2019
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:32:23AM +0000, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> I think this is ok.
Ok, committed the simpler version.
> The "q" constraint was introduced after the iwmmxt.md patterns were written and it seems
> that they were just never updated to use it.
> It's hard for anyone to get a hold of the relevant hardware to test iwmmxt these days,
> so I suspect that path hasn't been thoroughly tested.
> In my opinion the ldrd/strd-related logic there should follow the same approach as the rest of
> the arm backend, that is, using 'q'.
>
> A patch to update the iwmmxt.md constraints in that way is pre-approved.
Thinking about it some more, given that the "q" constraint has been
introduced exactly for the ldrdstrd.md created movdi patterns
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg00604.html),
we don't generate those anymore, and r13 aka sp is a FIXED_REGISTERS, I
wonder if instead of that we shouldn't change *arm_movdi and *movdi_vfp
patterns (what about *movdf_soft_insn ?) to use r constraint again - the RA
shouldn't be putting DImode regs at ip, because only half of that register
is non-fixed and previously the only way to get there was ldrdstrd
peephole2s, but those use *arm_ldrd/*arm_strd patterns now.
So like the patch below (though, I have only limited possibilities to test
this, can throw it in armv7hl-linux-gnueabi distro build).
2019-02-11 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR bootstrap/88714
* config/arm/arm.md (*arm_movdi, *movdf_soft_insn): Use "r" instead of
"q" constraint.
* config/arm/vfp.md (*movdi_vfp): Likewise.
* config/arm/ldrdstrd.md (*arm_ldrd, *arm_strd): Use "r" instead of
"q" constraint for operands[1].
--- gcc/config/arm/arm.md.jj 2019-01-31 00:26:04.417738975 +0100
+++ gcc/config/arm/arm.md 2019-02-11 12:02:32.778707056 +0100
@@ -5817,8 +5817,8 @@ (define_expand "movdi"
)
(define_insn "*arm_movdi"
- [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_di_operand" "=r, r, r, q, m")
- (match_operand:DI 1 "di_operand" "rDa,Db,Dc,mi,q"))]
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_di_operand" "=r, r, r, r, m")
+ (match_operand:DI 1 "di_operand" "rDa,Db,Dc,mi,r"))]
"TARGET_32BIT
&& !(TARGET_HARD_FLOAT)
&& !TARGET_IWMMXT
@@ -7102,8 +7102,8 @@ (define_expand "reload_outdf"
)
(define_insn "*movdf_soft_insn"
- [(set (match_operand:DF 0 "nonimmediate_soft_df_operand" "=r,r,r,q,m")
- (match_operand:DF 1 "soft_df_operand" "rDa,Db,Dc,mF,q"))]
+ [(set (match_operand:DF 0 "nonimmediate_soft_df_operand" "=r,r,r,r,m")
+ (match_operand:DF 1 "soft_df_operand" "rDa,Db,Dc,mF,r"))]
"TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT
&& ( register_operand (operands[0], DFmode)
|| register_operand (operands[1], DFmode))"
--- gcc/config/arm/vfp.md.jj 2019-01-31 00:26:04.312740661 +0100
+++ gcc/config/arm/vfp.md 2019-02-11 12:03:13.232045976 +0100
@@ -307,8 +307,8 @@ (define_insn "*thumb2_movsi_vfp"
;; DImode moves
(define_insn "*movdi_vfp"
- [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_di_operand" "=r,r,r,r,q,q,m,w,!r,w,w, Uv")
- (match_operand:DI 1 "di_operand" "r,rDa,Db,Dc,mi,mi,q,r,w,w,UvTu,w"))]
+ [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_di_operand" "=r,r,r,r,r,r,m,w,!r,w,w, Uv")
+ (match_operand:DI 1 "di_operand" "r,rDa,Db,Dc,mi,mi,r,r,w,w,UvTu,w"))]
"TARGET_32BIT && TARGET_HARD_FLOAT
&& ( register_operand (operands[0], DImode)
|| register_operand (operands[1], DImode))
--- gcc/config/arm/ldrdstrd.md.jj 2019-02-11 11:39:39.977125795 +0100
+++ gcc/config/arm/ldrdstrd.md 2019-02-11 12:03:57.978314745 +0100
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ (define_peephole2 ; swap the destination
(define_insn "*arm_ldrd"
[(parallel [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=q")
(match_operand:SI 2 "memory_operand" "m"))
- (set (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "=q")
+ (set (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "=r")
(match_operand:SI 3 "memory_operand" "m"))])]
"TARGET_LDRD && TARGET_ARM && reload_completed
&& valid_operands_ldrd_strd (operands, true)"
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ (define_insn "*arm_strd"
[(parallel [(set (match_operand:SI 2 "memory_operand" "=m")
(match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "q"))
(set (match_operand:SI 3 "memory_operand" "=m")
- (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "q"))])]
+ (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "r"))])]
"TARGET_LDRD && TARGET_ARM && reload_completed
&& valid_operands_ldrd_strd (operands, false)"
{
Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list