[PATCH] Improve A*B+-A -> A*(B+-1) and A+-A*B -> A*(1+-B) match.pd optimization
Richard Biener
rguenther@suse.de
Mon Dec 2 08:42:00 GMT 2019
On Sat, 30 Nov 2019, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the PR, we can't optimize e.g.
> int a = t - 1;
> int b = a * v;
> return b + v;
> into return t * v; for signed non-wrapv arithmetics. This can be done
> by the match.pd (A * B) +- A -> (B +- 1) * A or
> A +- (A * B) -> (1 +- B) * A canonicalizations. Being a lazy guy,
> I wrote attached brute force proglet to look for all the cases (for signed
> char) where there is no UB in the original and the transformation would
> introduce UB. For the simple cases with just A and B, rather than A, B and
> C, the problematic cases are for signed char only:
> A*B+A -> (B+1)*A A==-1 && B==127
> A*B+A -> (B+1)*A A==0 && B==127
> A*B-A -> (B-1)*A A==0 && B==-128
> A-A*B -> (1-B)*A A==-1 && B==-127
> A-A*B -> (1-B)*A A==0 && B==-128
> A-A*B -> (1-B)*A A==0 && B==-127
> The current patterns already use VRP (tree_expr_nonzero_p and
> expr_not_equal_to) to do the transformation only if A is known not to be 0
> or -1. But as the above problematic cases show, for A*B-A the -1
> case is actually not problematic (transformation doesn't introduce UB;
> if A is -1, -1*B+1 has UB only for minimum and minimum+1, and the
> replacement (B-1)*-1 has also UB for those two cases only) and even when we
> know nothing about A value range, if we know something about B value range,
> we could still optimize. So, for the
> int a = t - 1;
> int b = a * v;
> return b + v;
> case, the a = t - 1 has value range that doesn't include maximum and
> so we can conclude it is ok to transform it into return ((t - 1) + 1) * v
> and thus t * v.
>
> Unfortunately, the patch "broke" a few loop_versioning_*.f90 tests (CCing
> author), where there are small differences between the lversion pass,
> e.g. in loop_versioning_1.f90 (f1):
> - # RANGE ~[0, 0]
> - _4 = iftmp.11_6 * S.4_19;
> - _11 = _4 - iftmp.11_6;
> + # RANGE [0, 9223372036854775806] NONZERO 9223372036854775807
> + _4 = S.4_19 + -1;
> + _11 = _4 * iftmp.11_6;
> and the lversion pass then emits just one message instead of two, but in the
> end assembly is identical. In loop_versioning_6.f90 (though, with -m32
> only), the code before lversion pass actually looks better in f1:
> - # i_35 = PHI <1(8), i_28(9)>
> - _9 = iftmp.33_15 * i_35;
> - _10 = _9 * 2;
> - _21 = _10 - iftmp.33_15;
> - (*x.0_23)[_21] = 1.0e+2;
> - _11 = i_35 * 2;
> - _12 = _11 + 1;
> - _13 = _12 * iftmp.33_15;
> - _22 = _13 - iftmp.33_15;
> - (*x.0_23)[_22] = 1.01e+2;
> - i_28 = i_35 + 1;
> - if (iftmp.36_25 < i_28)
> + # i_31 = PHI <1(8), i_26(9)>
> + _10 = iftmp.33_13 * i_31;
> + _11 = _10 * 2;
> + _19 = _11 - iftmp.33_13;
> + (*x.0_21)[_19] = 1.0e+2;
> + (*x.0_21)[_11] = 1.01e+2;
> + i_26 = i_31 + 1;
> + if (iftmp.36_23 < i_26)
> where due to the new canonicalizations we managed to avoid some
> multiplications. One index was iftmp*i*2-iftmp and the other
> was iftmp*(i*2+1)-iftmp and with the patch we managed to simplify
> the latter into iftmp*i*2 and use for that the temporary used for
> the first expression. f1 is actually in assembly smaller because of this.
> The lp64 vs. ! lp64 is just a wild guess, guess testing on further targets
> will show what is the target property that matters.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
> 2019-11-29 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/92712
> * match.pd ((A * B) +- A -> (B +- 1) * A,
> A +- (A * B) -> (1 +- B) * A): Allow optimizing signed integers
> even when we don't know anything about range of A, but do know
> something about range of B and the simplification won't introduce
> new UB.
>
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92712-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92712-2.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92712-3.c: New test.
> * gfortran.dg/loop_versioning_1.f90: Adjust expected number of
> likely to be innermost dimension messages.
> * gfortran.dg/loop_versioning_10.f90: Likewise.
> * gfortran.dg/loop_versioning_6.f90: Likewise.
>
> --- gcc/match.pd.jj 2019-11-05 14:59:22.546873967 +0100
> +++ gcc/match.pd 2019-11-29 18:17:27.472002727 +0100
> @@ -2480,18 +2480,42 @@ (define_operator_list COND_TERNARY
> (plusminus @0 (mult:c@3 @0 @2))
> (if ((!ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type)
> + /* For @0 + @0*@2 this transformation would introduce UB
> + (where there was none before) for @0 in [-1,0] and @2 max.
> + For @0 - @0*@2 this transformation would introduce UB
> + for @0 0 and @2 in [min,min+1] or @0 -1 and @2 min+1. */
> || (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> - && tree_expr_nonzero_p (@0)
> - && expr_not_equal_to (@0, wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION (type)))))
> + && ((tree_expr_nonzero_p (@0)
> + && expr_not_equal_to (@0,
> + wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION (type))))
> + || (plusminus == PLUS_EXPR
> + ? expr_not_equal_to (@2,
> + wi::max_value (TYPE_PRECISION (type), SIGNED))
> + /* Let's ignore the @0 -1 and @2 min case. */
> + : (expr_not_equal_to (@2,
> + wi::min_value (TYPE_PRECISION (type), SIGNED))
> + && expr_not_equal_to (@2,
> + wi::min_value (TYPE_PRECISION (type), SIGNED)
> + + 1))))))
> && single_use (@3))
> (mult (plusminus { build_one_cst (type); } @2) @0)))
> (simplify
> (plusminus (mult:c@3 @0 @2) @0)
> (if ((!ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> || TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (type)
> + /* For @0*@2 + @0 this transformation would introduce UB
> + (where there was none before) for @0 in [-1,0] and @2 max.
> + For @0*@2 - @0 this transformation would introduce UB
> + for @0 0 and @2 min. */
> || (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
> - && tree_expr_nonzero_p (@0)
> - && expr_not_equal_to (@0, wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION (type)))))
> + && ((tree_expr_nonzero_p (@0)
> + && (plusminus == MINUS_EXPR
> + || expr_not_equal_to (@0,
> + wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION (type)))))
> + || expr_not_equal_to (@2,
> + (plusminus == PLUS_EXPR
> + ? wi::max_value (TYPE_PRECISION (type), SIGNED)
> + : wi::min_value (TYPE_PRECISION (type), SIGNED))))))
> && single_use (@3))
> (mult (plusminus @2 { build_one_cst (type); }) @0))))))
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92712-1.c.jj 2019-11-29 19:47:42.900389708 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92712-1.c 2019-11-29 19:50:26.704925013 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/92712 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " = \[tv]_\[0-9]*\\\(D\\\) \\* \[tv]_\[0-9]*\\\(D\\\);" "optimized" } } */
> +
> +static int
> +foo (int t, int v)
> +{
> + int i, x = 0;
> + for (int i = 0; i < t; ++i)
> + x += v;
> + return x;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +bar (int t, int v)
> +{
> + if (t < 0)
> + __builtin_unreachable ();
> + return foo (t, v);
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92712-2.c.jj 2019-11-29 19:51:47.169714383 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92712-2.c 2019-11-29 20:12:21.792153466 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/92712 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-ipa-icf -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \[tv]_\[0-9]*\\\(D\\\) \\* \[tv]_\[0-9]*\\\(D\\\);" 7 "optimized" } } */
> +
> +int
> +f1 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + int a = t - 1;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return b + v;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f2 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + int a = t - 1;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return v + b;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f3 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + int a = t + 1;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return b - v;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f4 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + int a = 1 - t;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return v - b;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f5 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + if (v == 0 || v == -1)
> + __builtin_unreachable ();
> + int a = t - 1U;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return b + v;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f6 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + if (v == 0 || v == -1)
> + __builtin_unreachable ();
> + int a = t - 1U;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return v + b;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f7 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + if (v == 0)
> + __builtin_unreachable ();
> + int a = t + 1U;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return b - v;
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92712-3.c.jj 2019-11-29 20:07:52.313198937 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr92712-3.c 2019-11-29 20:08:16.890829972 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/92712 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-ipa-icf -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = \[tv]_\[0-9]*\\\(D\\\) \\* \[tv]_\[0-9]*\\\(D\\\);" "optimized" } } */
> +
> +int
> +f1 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + int a = t - 1U;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return b + v;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f2 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + int a = t - 1U;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return v + b;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f3 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + int a = t + 1U;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return b - v;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f4 (int t, int v)
> +{
> + int a = 1U - t;
> + int b = a * v;
> + return v - b;
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/loop_versioning_1.f90.jj 2019-01-19 18:27:58.396602572 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/loop_versioning_1.f90 2019-11-30 00:49:42.250277985 +0100
> @@ -23,6 +23,6 @@ subroutine f3(x, limit, step)
> end do
> end subroutine f3
>
> -! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {likely to be the innermost dimension} 2 "lversion" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {likely to be the innermost dimension} 1 "lversion" } }
> ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {want to version containing loop} 3 "lversion" } }
> ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {versioned this loop} 3 "lversion" } }
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/loop_versioning_10.f90.jj 2019-01-19 18:27:58.396602572 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/loop_versioning_10.f90 2019-11-30 00:49:53.159113815 +0100
> @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ subroutine f4(x, i)
> end do
> end subroutine f4
>
> -! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {likely to be the innermost dimension} 6 "lversion" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {likely to be the innermost dimension} 4 "lversion" } }
> ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {want to version} 4 "lversion" } }
> ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {versioned} 4 "lversion" } }
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/loop_versioning_6.f90.jj 2018-12-17 22:13:44.485132746 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/loop_versioning_6.f90 2019-11-30 00:58:42.291150793 +0100
> @@ -89,5 +89,7 @@ subroutine f9(x, limit, step)
> end do
> end subroutine f9
>
> -! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {want to version containing loop} 9 "lversion" } }
> -! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {versioned this loop} 9 "lversion" } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {want to version containing loop} 9 "lversion" { target lp64 } } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {versioned this loop} 9 "lversion" { target lp64 } } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {want to version containing loop} 8 "lversion" { target { ! lp64 } } } }
> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {versioned this loop} 8 "lversion" { target { ! lp64 } } } }
>
> Jakub
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list