[PATCH] Fix PR91469
Richard Biener
rguenther@suse.de
Fri Aug 16 11:55:00 GMT 2019
The following fixes PR91469 where STV replaced uses inside address
expressions. The issue arises here because convert_regs is called
before convert_insns which eventually splits out memory operands.
Bootstrapped / tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?
Thanks,
Richard.
2019-08-16 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR target/91469
* config/i386/i386-features.c
(general_scalar_chain::replace_with_subreg): Stop at memory operands.
* gcc.target/i386/pr91469-1.c: New testcase.
* gcc.target/i386/pr91469-2.c: Likewise.
Index: gcc/config/i386/i386-features.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/i386/i386-features.c (revision 274536)
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386-features.c (working copy)
@@ -613,6 +613,10 @@ general_scalar_chain::replace_with_subre
if (x == reg)
return gen_rtx_SUBREG (vmode, new_reg, 0);
+ /* But not in memory addresses. */
+ if (MEM_P (x))
+ return x;
+
const char *fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT (GET_CODE (x));
int i, j;
for (i = GET_RTX_LENGTH (GET_CODE (x)) - 1; i >= 0; i--)
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91469-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91469-1.c (nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91469-1.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-funroll-loops -O2 -fno-gcse -mavx512vbmi -fno-ivopts -mstv" } */
+
+int a, b, e;
+long long c;
+int d[6];
+
+void fn1() {
+ int i;
+ unsigned f;
+ c = a;
+ f = i;
+ for (; i < b; i++)
+ if (d[i] > f)
+ f = d[i];
+ e = f;
+}
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91469-2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91469-2.c (nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr91469-2.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Os --param scev-max-expr-size=0 -mavx512vnni -funroll-all-loops" } */
+
+int a, b, c, d;
+int *e;
+void fn1()
+{
+ b = c > 0 ? c : 0;
+ d += e[b];
+ a = d > 0 ? d : 0;
+}
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list