[GCC 9 RM attention] Re: [OpenACC] Update OpenACC data clause semantics to the 2.5 behavior

Thomas Schwinge thomas@codesourcery.com
Tue Apr 30 08:28:00 GMT 2019


Hi Jakub!

On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:59:03 +0200, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > I know it's very late in the GCC 9 release process, but I'm still
> > catching up with OpenACC patch review, and just at the end of last week
> > I'd noticed that this commit (trunk r261813):
> 
> I'd like to see full patch before considering.  The bar at this point for
> anything to gcc-9-branch is very high.

Sure, understood.


I've spent some time thinking about this ABI change, back and forth, and
even produced the obvious patch (to use 'GOACC_FLAG_IF_PRESENT',
'GOACC_FLAG_FINALIZE'; attached for posterity), but in the end I'd like
to withdraw, and keep the current ABI.  (..., and I'll instead follow up,
at a later point in time, with some documentation updates and code
restructuring, to make this better understandable/maintainable.)


Grüße
 Thomas


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-WIP-GOACC_FLAG_IF_PRESENT-GOACC_FLAG_FINALIZE.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 5905 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20190430/a0af460a/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 658 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20190430/a0af460a/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list