[PATCH] Default to an ARM cpu that exists

Richard Earnshaw (lists) Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Mon Oct 22 18:01:00 GMT 2018


On 22/10/2018 16:36, coypu@sdf.org wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 03:56:24PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> I think strongarm would be a better choice.  I'm not aware of anyone
>> running NetBSD on Arm8 cpus.
> 
> Clarifying: this is the global default for all GCC ARM targets,
> not just netbsd. Is strongarm still the preferred choice?
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Yes, I think so.  The two are architecturally compatible (and not that
dissimilar in terms of optimization strategies), so StrongArm is
probably a better choice for that generation.

R.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list