[Patch, Fortran] PR87597 - fix off-by-one issue with inline matmul
Dominique d'Humières
dominiq@lps.ens.fr
Sat Oct 13 12:23:00 GMT 2018
Hi Tobias,
UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_24.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "gamma5[__var_1_do \\\\* 4 \\\\+ __var_2_do]" 1
UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_24.f90 -O1 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "gamma5[__var_1_do \\\\* 4 \\\\+ __var_2_do]" 1
UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_24.f90 -O2 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "gamma5[__var_1_do \\\\* 4 \\\\+ __var_2_do]" 1
UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_24.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions scan-tree-dump-times optimized "gamma5[__var_1_do \\\\* 4 \\\\+ __var_2_do]" 1
UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_24.f90 -O3 -g scan-tree-dump-times optimized "gamma5[__var_1_do \\\\* 4 \\\\+ __var_2_do]" 1
UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_24.f90 -Os scan-tree-dump-times optimized "gamma5[__var_1_do \\\\* 4 \\\\+ __var_2_do]" 1
IMO this comes from
! { dg-options "-ffrontend-optimize -fdump-tree-original" }
…
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "gamma5\[__var_1_do \\* 4 \\+ __var_2_do\]" 1 "optimized" } }
Shouldn’t -fdump-tree-original be -fdump-tree-optimized?
TIA
Dominique
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list