[PATCH][AARCH64][PR target/84882] Add mno-strict-align
Sudakshina Das
sudi.das@arm.com
Wed May 23 11:47:00 GMT 2018
Hi Richard
On 18/05/18 15:48, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 27/03/18 13:58, Sudakshina Das wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This patch adds the no variant to -mstrict-align and the corresponding
>> function attribute. To enable the function attribute, I have modified
>> aarch64_can_inline_p () to allow checks even when the callee function
>> has no attribute. The need for this is shown by the new test
>> target_attr_18.c.
>>
>> Testing: Bootstrapped, regtested and added new tests that are copies
>> of earlier tests checking -mstrict-align with opposite scan directives.
>>
>> Is this ok for trunk?
>>
>> Sudi
>>
>>
>> *** gcc/ChangeLog ***
>>
>> 2018-03-27 Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@arm.com>
>>
>> Â Â Â Â * common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.c (aarch64_handle_option):
>> Â Â Â Â Check val before adding MASK_STRICT_ALIGN to opts->x_target_flags.
>> Â Â Â Â * config/aarch64/aarch64.opt (mstrict-align): Remove RejectNegative.
>> Â Â Â Â * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_attributes): Mark allow_neg
>> Â Â Â Â as true for strict-align.
>> Â Â Â Â (aarch64_can_inline_p): Perform checks even when callee has no
>> Â Â Â Â attributes to check for strict alignment.
>> Â Â Â Â * doc/extend.texi (AArch64 Function Attributes): Document
>> Â Â Â Â no-strict-align.
>> Â Â Â Â * doc/invoke.texi: (AArch64 Options): Likewise.
>>
>> *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***
>>
>> 2018-03-27 Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@arm.com>
>>
>> Â Â Â Â * gcc.target/aarch64/pr84882.c: New test.
>> Â Â Â Â * gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_18.c: Likewise.
>>
>> strict-align.diff
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.c b/gcc/common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.c
>> index 7fd9305..d5655a0 100644
>> --- a/gcc/common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.c
>> +++ b/gcc/common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.c
>> @@ -97,7 +97,10 @@ aarch64_handle_option (struct gcc_options *opts,
>> return true;
>>
>> case OPT_mstrict_align:
>> - opts->x_target_flags |= MASK_STRICT_ALIGN;
>> + if (val)
>> + opts->x_target_flags |= MASK_STRICT_ALIGN;
>> + else
>> + opts->x_target_flags &= ~MASK_STRICT_ALIGN;
>> return true;
>>
>> case OPT_momit_leaf_frame_pointer:
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> index 4b5183b..4f35a6c 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> @@ -11277,7 +11277,7 @@ static const struct aarch64_attribute_info aarch64_attributes[] =
>> { "fix-cortex-a53-843419", aarch64_attr_bool, true, NULL,
>> OPT_mfix_cortex_a53_843419 },
>> { "cmodel", aarch64_attr_enum, false, NULL, OPT_mcmodel_ },
>> - { "strict-align", aarch64_attr_mask, false, NULL, OPT_mstrict_align },
>> + { "strict-align", aarch64_attr_mask, true, NULL, OPT_mstrict_align },
>> { "omit-leaf-frame-pointer", aarch64_attr_bool, true, NULL,
>> OPT_momit_leaf_frame_pointer },
>> { "tls-dialect", aarch64_attr_enum, false, NULL, OPT_mtls_dialect_ },
>> @@ -11640,16 +11640,13 @@ aarch64_can_inline_p (tree caller, tree callee)
>> tree caller_tree = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_TARGET (caller);
>> tree callee_tree = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_TARGET (callee);
>>
>> - /* If callee has no option attributes, then it is ok to inline. */
>> - if (!callee_tree)
>> - return true;
>
> I think it's still useful to spot the case where both callee_tree and
> caller_tree are NULL. In that case both options will pick up
> target_option_default_node and will always be compatible; so you can
> short-circuit that case, which is the most likely scenario.
>
>> -
>> struct cl_target_option *caller_opts
>> = TREE_TARGET_OPTION (caller_tree ? caller_tree
>> : target_option_default_node);
>>
>> - struct cl_target_option *callee_opts = TREE_TARGET_OPTION (callee_tree);
>> -
>> + struct cl_target_option *callee_opts
>> + = TREE_TARGET_OPTION (callee_tree ? callee_tree
>> + : target_option_default_node);
>>
>> /* Callee's ISA flags should be a subset of the caller's. */
>> if ((caller_opts->x_aarch64_isa_flags & callee_opts->x_aarch64_isa_flags)
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.opt b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.opt
>> index 52eaf8c..1426b45 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.opt
>> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.opt
>> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Target RejectNegative Joined Enum(cmodel) Var(aarch64_cmodel_var) Init(AARCH64_C
>> Specify the code model.
>>
>> mstrict-align
>> -Target Report RejectNegative Mask(STRICT_ALIGN) Save
>> +Target Report Mask(STRICT_ALIGN) Save
>> Don't assume that unaligned accesses are handled by the system.
>>
>> momit-leaf-frame-pointer
>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
>> index 93a0ebc..dcda216 100644
>> --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
>> +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
>> @@ -3605,8 +3605,10 @@ for the command line option @option{-mcmodel=}.
>> @item strict-align
>
> Other targets add an @itemx for the no-variant.
>
>> @cindex @code{strict-align} function attribute, AArch64
>> Indicates that the compiler should not assume that unaligned memory references
>> -are handled by the system. The behavior is the same as for the command-line
>> -option @option{-mstrict-align}.
>> +are handled by the system. To allow the compiler to assume that aligned memory
>> +references are handled by the system, the inverse attribute
>> +@code{no-strict-align} can be specified. The behavior is the same as for the
>> +command-line option @option{-mstrict-align} and @option{-mno-strict-align}.
>
> You've two options now, so 'options'.
>
>>
>> @item omit-leaf-frame-pointer
>> @cindex @code{omit-leaf-frame-pointer} function attribute, AArch64
>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> index feacd56..0574d21 100644
>> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
>> @gccoptlist{-mabi=@var{name} -mbig-endian -mlittle-endian @gol
>> -mgeneral-regs-only @gol
>> -mcmodel=tiny -mcmodel=small -mcmodel=large @gol
>> --mstrict-align @gol
>> +-mstrict-align -mno-strict-align @gol
>> -momit-leaf-frame-pointer @gol
>> -mtls-dialect=desc -mtls-dialect=traditional @gol
>> -mtls-size=@var{size} @gol
>> @@ -14601,9 +14601,11 @@ Generate code for the large code model. This makes no assumptions about
>> addresses and sizes of sections. Programs can be statically linked only.
>>
>> @item -mstrict-align
>> +@itemx -mno-strict-align
>> @opindex mstrict-align
>> -Avoid generating memory accesses that may not be aligned on a natural object
>> -boundary as described in the architecture specification.
>> +@opindex mno-strict-align
>> +Avoid or allow generating memory accesses that may not be aligned on a natural
>> +object boundary as described in the architecture specification.
>>
>> @item -momit-leaf-frame-pointer
>> @itemx -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr84882.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr84882.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ffc7d55
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr84882.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
>> +/* This is a copy of pr71727.c with scanning reversed. */
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-mstrict-align -O3 -mno-strict-align" } */
>> +
>> +struct test_struct_s
>> +{
>> + long a;
>> + long b;
>> + long c;
>> + long d;
>> + unsigned long e;
>> +};
>> +
>> +
>> +char _a;
>> +struct test_struct_s xarray[128];
>> +
>> +void
>> +_start (void)
>> +{
>> + struct test_struct_s *new_entry;
>> +
>> + new_entry = &xarray[0];
>> + new_entry->a = 1;
>> + new_entry->b = 2;
>> + new_entry->c = 3;
>> + new_entry->d = 4;
>> + new_entry->e = 5;
>> +
>> + return;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "add\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+, :" {target lp64} } } */
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_18.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_18.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..33b1d44
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/target_attr_18.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +/* This is a copy of target_attr_6.c to instead check no-strict-align. */
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -save-temps -mstrict-align" } */
>> +
>> +/* Inlining strict-align functions into non-strict align
>> + functions is not allowed. */
>> +
>> +int
>> +bar (int a)
>> +{
>> + return a - 6;
>> +}
>> +
>> +__attribute__ ((target ("no-strict-align")))
>> +int
>> +bam (int a)
>> +{
>> + return a - bar (a);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bl.*bar" } } */
>>
>
> OK with those changes. As Kyrill said, don't forget the PR number in
> the changelog.
>
Thank you for approving. Committed with suggested changes as r260604.
Sudi
> R.
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list