[C++ PATCH] Fix offsetof constexpr handling (PR c++/85662, take 4)

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Thu May 10 15:24:00 GMT 2018


OK, thanks.

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 11:01:18AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:40:26AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 11:28:18PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> >> Maybe add a type parameter that defaults to size_type_node...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > +       ret = fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (expr),
>> >> >> > +                               fold_offsetof_1 (TREE_TYPE (expr), op0));
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ...and then this can be
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   fold_offsetof (op0, TREE_TYPE (exp0))
>> >> >
>> >> > Like this then?
>> >> >
>> >> > +       ret = fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (expr),
>> >> > +                               fold_offsetof (op0, TREE_TYPE (expr)));
>> >>
>> >> I was thinking that we then wouldn't need the fold_convert at the call
>> >> sites anymore, either.
>> >
>> > The patch only converts to non-pointer types, I'm not sure if it is
>> > desirable to do the same with pointer types (and most of the other callers
>> > don't use convert, but fold_convert which is significantly different, the
>> > former is emitting diagnostics, the latter is just an conversion + optimization).
>>
>> Is there a reason we can't use fold_convert for the non-pointer case,
>> too?  I don't think we're interested in diagnostics from this
>> particular call.
>
> This patch instead uses convert everywhere.  Bootstrapped/regtested on
> x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2018-05-09  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
>         PR c++/85662
>         * c-common.h (fold_offsetof_1): Removed.
>         (fold_offsetof): Add TYPE argument defaulted to size_type_node and
>         CTX argument defaulted to ERROR_MARK.
>         * c-common.c (fold_offsetof_1): Renamed to ...
>         (fold_offsetof): ... this.  Remove wrapper function.  Add TYPE
>         argument, convert the pointer constant to TYPE and use size_binop
>         with PLUS_EXPR instead of fold_build_pointer_plus if type is not
>         a pointer type.  Adjust recursive calls.
>
>         * c-fold.c (c_fully_fold_internal): Use fold_offsetof rather than
>         fold_offsetof_1, pass TREE_TYPE (expr) as TYPE to it and drop the
>         fold_convert_loc.
>         * c-typeck.c (build_unary_op): Use fold_offsetof rather than
>         fold_offsetof_1, pass argtype as TYPE to it and drop the
>         fold_convert_loc.
>
>         * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold): Use fold_offsetof rather than
>         fold_offsetof_1, pass TREE_TYPE (x) as TYPE to it and drop the
>         fold_convert.
>
>         * g++.dg/ext/offsetof2.C: New test.
>
> --- gcc/c-family/c-common.h.jj  2018-05-09 20:12:25.845258371 +0200
> +++ gcc/c-family/c-common.h     2018-05-09 20:20:02.265649121 +0200
> @@ -1033,8 +1033,8 @@ extern bool c_dump_tree (void *, tree);
>
>  extern void verify_sequence_points (tree);
>
> -extern tree fold_offsetof_1 (tree, tree_code ctx = ERROR_MARK);
> -extern tree fold_offsetof (tree);
> +extern tree fold_offsetof (tree, tree = size_type_node,
> +                          tree_code ctx = ERROR_MARK);
>
>  extern int complete_array_type (tree *, tree, bool);
>
> --- gcc/c-family/c-common.c.jj  2018-05-09 20:12:25.763258297 +0200
> +++ gcc/c-family/c-common.c     2018-05-09 20:21:23.770718896 +0200
> @@ -6168,10 +6168,11 @@ c_common_to_target_charset (HOST_WIDE_IN
>
>  /* Fold an offsetof-like expression.  EXPR is a nested sequence of component
>     references with an INDIRECT_REF of a constant at the bottom; much like the
> -   traditional rendering of offsetof as a macro.  Return the folded result.  */
> +   traditional rendering of offsetof as a macro.  TYPE is the desired type of
> +   the whole expression.  Return the folded result.  */
>
>  tree
> -fold_offsetof_1 (tree expr, enum tree_code ctx)
> +fold_offsetof (tree expr, tree type, enum tree_code ctx)
>  {
>    tree base, off, t;
>    tree_code code = TREE_CODE (expr);
> @@ -6196,10 +6197,10 @@ fold_offsetof_1 (tree expr, enum tree_co
>           error ("cannot apply %<offsetof%> to a non constant address");
>           return error_mark_node;
>         }
> -      return TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0);
> +      return convert (type, TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0));
>
>      case COMPONENT_REF:
> -      base = fold_offsetof_1 (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), code);
> +      base = fold_offsetof (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), type, code);
>        if (base == error_mark_node)
>         return base;
>
> @@ -6216,7 +6217,7 @@ fold_offsetof_1 (tree expr, enum tree_co
>        break;
>
>      case ARRAY_REF:
> -      base = fold_offsetof_1 (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), code);
> +      base = fold_offsetof (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0), type, code);
>        if (base == error_mark_node)
>         return base;
>
> @@ -6273,23 +6274,16 @@ fold_offsetof_1 (tree expr, enum tree_co
>        /* Handle static members of volatile structs.  */
>        t = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1);
>        gcc_checking_assert (VAR_P (get_base_address (t)));
> -      return fold_offsetof_1 (t);
> +      return fold_offsetof (t, type);
>
>      default:
>        gcc_unreachable ();
>      }
>
> +  if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
> +    return size_binop (PLUS_EXPR, base, convert (type, off));
>    return fold_build_pointer_plus (base, off);
>  }
> -
> -/* Likewise, but convert it to the return type of offsetof.  */
> -
> -tree
> -fold_offsetof (tree expr)
> -{
> -  return convert (size_type_node, fold_offsetof_1 (expr));
> -}
> -
>
>  /* *PTYPE is an incomplete array.  Complete it with a domain based on
>     INITIAL_VALUE.  If INITIAL_VALUE is not present, use 1 if DO_DEFAULT
> --- gcc/c/c-fold.c.jj   2018-05-09 20:12:25.496258072 +0200
> +++ gcc/c/c-fold.c      2018-05-09 20:21:53.673744504 +0200
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ c_fully_fold_internal (tree expr, bool i
>           && (op1 = get_base_address (op0)) != NULL_TREE
>           && INDIRECT_REF_P (op1)
>           && TREE_CONSTANT (TREE_OPERAND (op1, 0)))
> -       ret = fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (expr), fold_offsetof_1 (op0));
> +       ret = fold_offsetof (op0, TREE_TYPE (expr));
>        else if (op0 != orig_op0 || in_init)
>         ret = in_init
>           ? fold_build1_initializer_loc (loc, code, TREE_TYPE (expr), op0)
> --- gcc/c/c-typeck.c.jj 2018-05-09 20:12:25.529258100 +0200
> +++ gcc/c/c-typeck.c    2018-05-09 20:22:10.592758986 +0200
> @@ -4676,7 +4676,7 @@ build_unary_op (location_t location, enu
>        if (val && INDIRECT_REF_P (val)
>            && TREE_CONSTANT (TREE_OPERAND (val, 0)))
>         {
> -         ret = fold_convert_loc (location, argtype, fold_offsetof_1 (arg));
> +         ret = fold_offsetof (arg, argtype);
>           goto return_build_unary_op;
>         }
>
> --- gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c.jj     2018-05-09 20:12:25.881258402 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c        2018-05-09 20:22:35.639780430 +0200
> @@ -2232,7 +2232,7 @@ cp_fold (tree x)
>               val = TREE_OPERAND (val, 0);
>               STRIP_NOPS (val);
>               if (TREE_CODE (val) == INTEGER_CST)
> -               return fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (x), fold_offsetof_1 (op0));
> +               return fold_offsetof (op0, TREE_TYPE (x));
>             }
>         }
>        goto finish_unary;
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/offsetof2.C.jj     2018-05-09 20:20:02.272649127 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/offsetof2.C        2018-05-09 20:20:02.272649127 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +// PR c++/85662
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +struct S { unsigned long x[31]; };
> +struct T { bool b; S f; };
> +static_assert (__builtin_offsetof (T, f.x[31 - 1]) == __builtin_offsetof (T, f.x[30]), "");
>
>
>         Jakub



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list