[PATCH 8/8] Enhance documentation of gcov.

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> 2017-04-27  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
>>
>> 	* doc/gcov.texi: Enhance documentation of gcov.
> Since I started picking on this change set I might as well keep
> at it ;)   Just a tiny nit: the sentence is missing a preposition:
> 
>   depending <ins>on </ins> whether a basic block is reachable.

This adds a bit more.  Applied.

(This section still needs a bit more love, ideally by a native
speaker.)

Gerald


2018-07-22  Gerald Pfeifer  <gerald@pfeifer.com>

	* doc/gcov.texi (Invoking Gcov): Editorial changes.

Index: doc/gcov.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/gcov.texi	(revision 262161)
+++ doc/gcov.texi	(working copy)
@@ -378,12 +378,12 @@
 containing no code.  Unexecuted lines are marked @samp{#####} or
 @samp{=====}, depending on whether they are reachable by
 non-exceptional paths or only exceptional paths such as C++ exception
-handlers, respectively. Given @samp{-a} option, unexecuted blocks are
+handlers, respectively. Given the @samp{-a} option, unexecuted blocks are
 marked @samp{$$$$$} or @samp{%%%%%}, depending on whether a basic block
 is reachable via non-exceptional or exceptional paths.
 Executed basic blocks having a statement with zero @var{execution_count}
-end with @samp{*} character and are colored with magenta color with @option{-k}
-option.  The functionality is not supported in Ada.
+end with @samp{*} character and are colored with magenta color with
+the @option{-k} option.  This functionality is not supported in Ada.
 
 Note that GCC can completely remove the bodies of functions that are
 not needed -- for instance if they are inlined everywhere.  Such functions