[PATCH, PR83327] Fix liveness analysis in lra for spilled-into hard regs

[Matthew Fortune]

Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com> writes:
> On 02/26/2018 12:00 PM, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> > Tom de Vries <Tom_deVries@mentor.com> writes:
> >> On 01/08/2018 05:32 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>> On 12/18/2017 05:57 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/15/2017 06:25 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Proposed Solution:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The patch addresses the problem, by:
> >>>>> - marking the hard regs that have been used in lra_spill in
> >>>>>    hard_regs_spilled_into
> >>>>> - using hard_regs_spilled_into in lra_create_live_ranges to
> >>>>>    make sure those registers are marked in the conflict_hard_regs
> >>>>>    of pseudos that overlap with the spill register usage
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ I've also tried an approach where I didn't use
> >>>>> hard_regs_spilled_into, but tried to propagate all hard regs. I
> >>>>> figured out that I needed to mask out eliminable_regset.  Also I
> >>>>> needed to masked out lra_no_alloc_regs, but that could be due to
> >>>>> gcn-specific problems (pointers take 2 hard regs), I'm not yet
> sure.
> >>>>> Anyway, in the submitted patch I tried to avoid these problems and
> >>>>> went for the more minimal approach. ]
> >>>>>
> >>>> Tom, thank you for the detail explanation of the problem and
> >>>> solutions you considered.  It helped me a lot.  Your simple
> >>>> solution is adequate as the most transformations and allocation are
> >>>> done on the 1st LRA subpasses iteration.
> >>>>> In order to get the patch accepted for trunk, I think we need:
> >>>>> - bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64
> >>>>> - build and reg-test on mips (the only primary platform that has
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>    spill_class hook enabled)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any comments?
> >>>>
> >>>> The patch looks ok to me.  You can commit it after successful
> >>>> testing on x86-64 and mips but I am sure there will be no problems
> >>>> with
> >>>> x86-64 as it does not use spill_class currently (actually your
> >>>> patch might help to switch it on again for x86-64.  spill_class was
> >>>> quite useful for x86-64 performance on Intel processors).
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Matthew,
> >>>
> >>> there's an lra optimization that is currently enabled for MIPS, and
> >>> not for any other primary or secondary target.
> >>>
> >>> This (already approved) patch fixes a bug in that optimization, and
> >>> needs to be tested on MIPS.
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately, the optimization is only enabled for MIPS16, and we
> >>> don't have a current setup to test this.
> >>>
> >>> Could you help us out here and test this patch for MIPS16 on trunk?
> >>
> >> Hi Matthew,
> >>
> >> is this something you can help us out with?
> >
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > I've just commented on the bug report that I've set of some builds to
> > try and give some assurance. It is far from comprehensive but it is as
> > good as the normal testing I do for MIPS16.
> >
> 
> Hi Matthew,
> 
> Awesome, thanks for the help.

I'm afraid my lack of attention has shown that there appears to be a
bug preventing libstdc++ building with MIPS16 that was introduced
somewhere between Oct 9th and Oct 10th. 47 commits left to bisect.

Matthew