Async I/O patch with compilation fix
Thomas Koenig
tkoenig@netcologne.de
Sun Aug 19 13:40:00 GMT 2018
Hi Christophe,
> Hi,
>> This is done by
>>
>> +#if defined(__GTHREAD_HAS_COND) && defined(__GTHREADS_CXX0X) &&
>> !defined(__ARMEB__)
>> +#define ASYNC_IO 1
>> +#else
>> +#define ASYNC_IO 0
>> +#endif
> I tried this version of the patch, and I'm still seeing the regression
> on array_constructor_8.f90.
Urgh...
Could you run
gcc -dM foo.h
with an empty foo.h in your target environment to see if
__ARMEB__ is actually defined? If it is not, what other
macro or combination of macros could be used?
At the moment, and with the data you posted in the PR, it seems that
this might be a library problem. Calling different library functions
with or without the patch seems to be an indication of that.
Currently, this patch holds up other major work :-(
What I would propose is to commit the patch as given in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-08/msg00007.html
and open a PR for the strange armeb failure (if the test
for the macros above does not a promising approach).
Let us then fix this PR before the 9.0 release.
Regards
Thomas
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list