[PATCH] Fix reassoc var_bound optimization (PR tree-optimization/85529)
Richard Biener
rguenther@suse.de
Fri Apr 27 07:21:00 GMT 2018
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As explained in the comment below, when doing the inter-bb range test
> optimization and are trying to optimize the
> a >= 0 && a < b
> where b is known to be >= 0 into
> (unsigned) a < (unsigned) b, we need to be careful if the a >= 0 condition
> is in a different bb from the a < b one and the a >= 0 bb dominates the
> block with the def stmt of b; then get_nonzero_bits can return flow
> dependent value range that isn't really valid if we optimize the a >= 0
> condition into true and modify the a < b condition to do unsigned
> comparison.
>
> Unfortunately, giving up completely breaks some testcases in the testsuite
> distilled from real-world code, so the patch handles the most common cases
> where b is known to be non-negative no matter what, in particular
> zero extension and masking the MSB off.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk and 8.1?
> Or do we want it for 8.2 only?
> The last testcase fails on 7.x branch too.
Looks good to me for 8.1, we eventually will need a RC2 anyways.
Thanks,
Richard.
> 2018-04-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/85529
> * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (optimize_range_tests_var_bound): Add FIRST_BB
> argument. Don't call get_nonzero_bits if opcode is ERROR_MARK_NODE,
> rhs2 def stmt's bb is dominated by first_bb and it isn't an obvious
> zero extension or masking of the MSB bit.
> (optimize_range_tests): Add FIRST_BB argument, pass it through
> to optimize_range_tests_var_bound.
> (maybe_optimize_range_tests, reassociate_bb): Adjust
> optimize_range_tests callers.
>
> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr85529-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr85529-2.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/pr85529.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c.jj 2018-03-16 09:06:06.431752536 +0100
> +++ gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c 2018-04-26 17:23:14.850769612 +0200
> @@ -3035,7 +3035,8 @@ optimize_range_tests_cmp_bitwise (enum t
> static bool
> optimize_range_tests_var_bound (enum tree_code opcode, int first, int length,
> vec<operand_entry *> *ops,
> - struct range_entry *ranges)
> + struct range_entry *ranges,
> + basic_block first_bb)
> {
> int i;
> bool any_changes = false;
> @@ -3143,6 +3144,60 @@ optimize_range_tests_var_bound (enum tre
> if (idx == NULL)
> continue;
>
> + /* maybe_optimize_range_tests allows statements without side-effects
> + in the basic blocks as long as they are consumed in the same bb.
> + Make sure rhs2's def stmt is not among them, otherwise we can't
> + use safely get_nonzero_bits on it. E.g. in:
> + # RANGE [-83, 1] NONZERO 173
> + # k_32 = PHI <k_47(13), k_12(9)>
> + ...
> + if (k_32 >= 0)
> + goto <bb 5>; [26.46%]
> + else
> + goto <bb 9>; [73.54%]
> +
> + <bb 5> [local count: 140323371]:
> + # RANGE [0, 1] NONZERO 1
> + _5 = (int) k_32;
> + # RANGE [0, 4] NONZERO 4
> + _21 = _5 << 2;
> + # RANGE [0, 4] NONZERO 4
> + iftmp.0_44 = (char) _21;
> + if (k_32 < iftmp.0_44)
> + goto <bb 6>; [84.48%]
> + else
> + goto <bb 9>; [15.52%]
> + the ranges on _5/_21/iftmp.0_44 are flow sensitive, assume that
> + k_32 >= 0. If we'd optimize k_32 >= 0 to true and k_32 < iftmp.0_44
> + to (unsigned) k_32 < (unsigned) iftmp.0_44, then we would execute
> + those stmts even for negative k_32 and the value ranges would be no
> + longer guaranteed and so the optimization would be invalid. */
> + if (opcode == ERROR_MARK)
> + {
> + gimple *g = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (rhs2);
> + basic_block bb2 = gimple_bb (g);
> + if (bb2
> + && bb2 != first_bb
> + && dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb2, first_bb))
> + {
> + /* As an exception, handle a few common cases. */
> + if (gimple_assign_cast_p (g)
> + && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (g)))
> + && TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (g)))
> + && (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (rhs2))
> + > TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (g)))))
> + /* Zero-extension is always ok. */ ;
> + else if (is_gimple_assign (g)
> + && gimple_assign_rhs_code (g) == BIT_AND_EXPR
> + && TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs2 (g)) == INTEGER_CST
> + && !wi::neg_p (wi::to_wide (gimple_assign_rhs2 (g))))
> + /* Masking with INTEGER_CST with MSB clear is always ok
> + too. */ ;
> + else
> + continue;
> + }
> + }
> +
> wide_int nz = get_nonzero_bits (rhs2);
> if (wi::neg_p (nz))
> continue;
> @@ -3269,11 +3324,12 @@ optimize_range_tests_var_bound (enum tre
> maybe_optimize_range_tests for inter-bb range optimization.
> In that case if oe->op is NULL, oe->id is bb->index whose
> GIMPLE_COND is && or ||ed into the test, and oe->rank says
> - the actual opcode. */
> + the actual opcode.
> + FIRST_BB is the first basic block if OPCODE is ERROR_MARK. */
>
> static bool
> optimize_range_tests (enum tree_code opcode,
> - vec<operand_entry *> *ops)
> + vec<operand_entry *> *ops, basic_block first_bb)
> {
> unsigned int length = ops->length (), i, j, first;
> operand_entry *oe;
> @@ -3353,7 +3409,7 @@ optimize_range_tests (enum tree_code opc
> any_changes |= optimize_range_tests_cmp_bitwise (opcode, first, length,
> ops, ranges);
> any_changes |= optimize_range_tests_var_bound (opcode, first, length, ops,
> - ranges);
> + ranges, first_bb);
>
> if (any_changes && opcode != ERROR_MARK)
> {
> @@ -4100,7 +4156,7 @@ maybe_optimize_range_tests (gimple *stmt
> break;
> }
> if (ops.length () > 1)
> - any_changes = optimize_range_tests (ERROR_MARK, &ops);
> + any_changes = optimize_range_tests (ERROR_MARK, &ops, first_bb);
> if (any_changes)
> {
> unsigned int idx, max_idx = 0;
> @@ -5855,7 +5911,7 @@ reassociate_bb (basic_block bb)
> if (is_vector)
> optimize_vec_cond_expr (rhs_code, &ops);
> else
> - optimize_range_tests (rhs_code, &ops);
> + optimize_range_tests (rhs_code, &ops, NULL);
> }
>
> if (rhs_code == MULT_EXPR && !is_vector)
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr85529-1.c.jj 2018-04-26 16:42:09.437704149 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr85529-1.c 2018-04-26 16:41:34.769689637 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/85529 */
> +
> +struct S { int a; };
> +
> +int b, c = 1, d, e, f;
> +static int g;
> +volatile struct S s;
> +
> +signed char
> +foo (signed char i, int j)
> +{
> + return i < 0 ? i : i << j;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> + signed char k = -83;
> + if (!d)
> + goto L;
> + k = e || f;
> +L:
> + for (; b < 1; b++)
> + s.a != (k < foo (k, 2) && (c = k = g));
> + if (c != 1)
> + __builtin_abort ();
> + return 0;
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr85529-2.c.jj 2018-04-26 16:42:12.370705372 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr85529-2.c 2018-04-26 16:41:19.377683198 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/85529 */
> +
> +__attribute__((noipa)) int
> +foo (int x)
> +{
> + x &= 63;
> + x -= 50;
> + x |= 1;
> + if (x < 0)
> + return 1;
> + int y = x >> 2;
> + if (x >= y)
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> + int i;
> + for (i = 0; i < 63; i++)
> + if (foo (i) != 1)
> + __builtin_abort ();
> + return 0;
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr85529.c.jj 2018-04-26 16:42:33.566714252 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr85529.c 2018-04-26 14:56:03.534264237 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/85529 */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-ssa-phiopt" } */
> +
> +__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) int
> +foo (int x)
> +{
> + x &= 31;
> + x -= 25;
> + x *= 2;
> + if (x < 0)
> + return 1;
> + int y = x >> 2;
> + if (x >= y)
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> + int i;
> + for (i = 0; i < 63; i++)
> + if (foo (i) != 1)
> + __builtin_abort ();
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list