[PATCH] Don't mark IFUNC resolver as only called directly

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Thu Apr 12 13:37:00 GMT 2018


On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 5:13 AM, Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:29 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>> Since IFUNC resolver is called indirectly, don't mark IFUNC resolver as
>> only called directly.
>>
>> OK for trunk?
>>
>>
>> H.J.
>> ---
>> gcc/
>>
>>         PR target/85345
>>         * cgraph.h: Include stringpool.h" and "attribs.h".
>>         (cgraph_node::only_called_directly_or_aliased_p): Return false
>>         for IFUNC resolver.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>>
>>         PR target/85345
>>         * gcc.target/i386/pr85345.c: New test.
>> ---
>>  gcc/cgraph.h                            |  5 +++-
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr85345.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr85345.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.h b/gcc/cgraph.h
>> index d1ef8408497..9e195824fcc 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cgraph.h
>> +++ b/gcc/cgraph.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>>  #include "profile-count.h"
>>  #include "ipa-ref.h"
>>  #include "plugin-api.h"
>> +#include "stringpool.h"
>> +#include "attribs.h"
>>
>>  class ipa_opt_pass_d;
>>  typedef ipa_opt_pass_d *ipa_opt_pass;
>> @@ -2894,7 +2896,8 @@ cgraph_node::only_called_directly_or_aliased_p (void)
>>           && !DECL_STATIC_CONSTRUCTOR (decl)
>>           && !DECL_STATIC_DESTRUCTOR (decl)
>>           && !used_from_object_file_p ()
>> -         && !externally_visible);
>> +         && !externally_visible
>> +         && !lookup_attribute ("ifunc", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl)));
>
> How's it handled for our own generated resolver functions?  That is,
> isn't there sth cheaper than doing a lookup_attribute here?  I see
> that make_dispatcher_decl nor ix86_get_function_versions_dispatcher
> adds the 'ifunc' attribute (though they are TREE_PUBLIC there).
>

ext/mv*.C tests failed to compile:

error: '-fcf-protection=full' requires Intel CET support. Use -mcet or
both of -mibt and -mshstk options to enable CET

with -fcf-protection -mcet.   So it is unsupported.

-- 
H.J.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list