[Patch, fortran] PR82586 - [PDT] ICE: write_symbol(): bad module symbol

Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle@charter.net
Fri Oct 20 22:39:00 GMT 2017


On 10/20/2017 11:55 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> In the last hour, I have added fixes for PRs 82587 and 82589. Please
> review them together with 82586.
> 
> I will stop work on Gerhard's PDT bugs until this patch is committed.
> Fortunately, Steve Kargl has proposed fixes for most of them :-)
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Paul
> 
> 2017-10-20  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
> 
>     PR fortran/82586
>     * decl.c (gfc_get_pdt_instance): Remove the error message that
>     the parameter does not have a corresponding component since
>     this is now taken care of when the derived type is resolved. Go
>     straight to error return instead.
>     (gfc_match_formal_arglist): Make the PDT relevant errors
>     immediate so that parsing of the derived type can continue.
>     (gfc_match_derived_decl): Do not check the match status on
>     return from gfc_match_formal_arglist for the same reason.
>     * resolve.c (resolve_fl_derived0): Check that each type
>     parameter has a corresponding component.
> 
>     PR fortran/82587
>     * resolve.c (resolve_generic_f): Check that the derived type
>     can be used before resolving the struture constructor.
> 
>     PR fortran/82589
>     * symbol.c (check_conflict): Add the conflicts involving PDT
>     KIND and LEN attributes.
> 
> 2017-10-20  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
> 
>     PR fortran/82586
>     * gfortran.dg/pdt_16.f03 : New test.
>     * gfortran.dg/pdt_4.f03 : Catch the changed messages.
>     * gfortran.dg/pdt_8.f03 : Ditto.
> 
>     PR fortran/82587
>     * gfortran.dg/pdt_17.f03 : New test.
> 
>     PR fortran/82589
>     * gfortran.dg/pdt_18.f03 : New test.
> 
> On 20 October 2017 at 18:17, Paul Richard Thomas
> <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> The attached patch is pretty clear with the ChangeLogs and is very
>> nearly obvious.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on FC23/x86_64 - OK for trunk?
>>
>> Paul

Looks Good to me. OK for trunk.

Jerry

PS The previous patch as well.

>>
>> 2017-10-20  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
>>
>>     PR fortran/82586
>>     * decl.c (gfc_get_pdt_instance): Remove the error message that
>>     the parameter does not have a corresponding component since
>>     this is now taken care of when the derived type is resolved. Go
>>     straight to error return instead.
>>     (gfc_match_formal_arglist): Make the PDT relevant errors
>>     immediate so that parsing of the derived type can continue.
>>     (gfc_match_derived_decl): Do not check the match status on
>>     return from gfc_match_formal_arglist for the same reason.
>>     * resolve.c (resolve_fl_derived0): Check that each type
>>     parameter has a corresponding component.
>>
>> 2017-10-20  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
>>
>>     PR fortran/82586
>>     * gfortran.dg/pdt_16.f03 : New test.
>>     * gfortran.dg/pdt_4.f03 : Catch the changed messages.
>>     * gfortran.dg/pdt_8.f03 : Ditto.
>>
>>
>> --
>> "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
>> - Albert Einstein
> 
> 
> 



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list