[PR 82363] Fix thinko in SRA subaccess propagation
Richard Biener
rguenther@suse.de
Mon Oct 2 17:56:00 GMT 2017
On October 2, 2017 7:19:19 PM GMT+02:00, Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>the following fixes a thinko in propagate_subaccesses_across_link.
>When we cannot copy over a tree of accesses of RHS to LHS because of
>some conflict, we must mark the whole LHS access (sub-)tree as
>potentially written, even when the RHS access describing this level is
>not, because some of its sub-accesses might be, which is exactly what
>happens in the PR.
>
>Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux. OK for trunk?
OK.
Richard.
>Thanks,
>
>Martin
>
>
>
>2017-10-02 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
>
> PR tree-optimization/82363
> * tree-sra.c (propagate_subaccesses_across_link): In unrecoverable
> mismatch, mark lacc written regardless of racc.
>
> testsuite/
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr82363.c: New test.
>---
>gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr82363.c | 50
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> gcc/tree-sra.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr82363.c
>
>diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr82363.c
>b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr82363.c
>new file mode 100644
>index 00000000000..6652468976b
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr82363.c
>@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
>+/* { dg-do run } */
>+/* { dg-options "-O" } */
>+
>+struct A
>+{
>+ int b;
>+ int c;
>+ int d;
>+};
>+
>+struct E
>+{
>+ int f;
>+ int g:18;
>+ struct A h;
>+};
>+
>+struct I
>+{
>+ int b;
>+ int j;
>+ struct E k;
>+};
>+
>+int l, *m = &l;
>+
>+struct A n;
>+struct I o;
>+
>+void __attribute__ ((noipa))
>+test_l (void)
>+{
>+ if (l != 1)
>+ __builtin_abort ();
>+}
>+
>+int main ()
>+{
>+ while (1)
>+ {
>+ struct I q = { 0, 0, {0, 0, {1, 1, 1}}}, p = q, r = p, *s = &q;
>+ if (p.k.h.c)
>+ o = p;
>+ *m = r.k.h.d;
>+ n = (*s).k.h;
>+ break;
>+ }
>+ test_l ();
>+ return 0;
>+}
>diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.c b/gcc/tree-sra.c
>index f5675edc7f1..bac593951e7 100644
>--- a/gcc/tree-sra.c
>+++ b/gcc/tree-sra.c
>@@ -2691,7 +2691,7 @@ propagate_subaccesses_across_link (struct access
>*lacc, struct access *racc)
> }
> else
> {
>- if (rchild->grp_write && !lacc->grp_write)
>+ if (!lacc->grp_write)
> {
> ret = true;
> subtree_mark_written_and_enqueue (lacc);
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list