Default std::vector<bool> default and move constructor

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 28/05/17 22:13 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>Sure but like freedom which stop where start others' freedom so does 
>those requirements :-). Because the Standard says that an allocator 
>will be value-init when there is no default-init it makes usage of the 
>C++11 default constructor more complicated.

It makes the std::lib implementors job harder, for the benefit of
users. That is the correct trade off.

We don't get to ignore the guarantees of the standard just because
they're difficult.