[PATCH 3/3] [D] libiberty: Prefix mangled D initializer symbols

Iain Buclaw ibuclaw@gdcproject.org
Sun May 28 12:31:00 GMT 2017


On 26 May 2017 at 20:20, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> wrote:
>> This is instead of adding a `.init$' postfix, which gave it a
>> property-style name.  My rationale being that "initializer for symbol"
>> is much more informative when inspecting D runtime type information in
>> gdb, which is the only place where you would encounter references to
>> this compiler-generated symbol.
>
> This is OK.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ian

Thanks, have committed this to trunk.

Regards
Iain



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list