[other/80803] libgo

[Bill Schmidt]

Hi Nathan,

Interestingly, this patch applies cleanly, but does *not* solve the problem with libgo.  
Another puzzling development, since bisection showed all revisions before this
being clean and all revisions afterward being problematic.  Drat. :(

I will have to go deeper into what's happening with the libgo test.

Thanks for the patch!  Too bad it didn't make a difference, though I can't be
surprised since the revision targeted by the bisect looks so innocuous.

Bill

> On May 17, 2017, at 1:02 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> On 05/17/2017 01:53 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> Bill,
>> the revision you converged on is, as Ian, says, just moving some interface around.  That was needed to fix obj-c++.
>> This diff is the combination of that patch and its logical predecessor. Does reverting this diff get you back to normalcy?
> 
> Sorry, apply this diff. I'd already done the -R applying bits
> 
> nathan
> 
> -- 
> Nathan Sidwell
>