[c++ PATCH] PR c++/80682

Richard Biener richard.guenther@gmail.com
Wed May 10 17:14:00 GMT 2017


On May 10, 2017 6:36:20 PM GMT+02:00, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
>On 05/10/2017 10:21 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>> On 10 May 2017 at 14:40, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
>
>> 
>> I appreciate that, but given that I operate under Write-After
>Approval, I need
>> more than a no-objection, I will need an actual ok from a maintainer.
>:)
>
>IIUC backports have to fix a regression.  So you'll need to convince
>the 
>release maintainer.  From a C++ POV you're approved.

Wrong-code, rejects-valid and ice-on-valid-code are generally fine to backport if the fixes are not too intrusive.

Richard.

>nathan



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list