[Patch] Forward triviality in variant

[Ville Voutilainen]

On 1 June 2017 at 18:29, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>> They all seem to be shortcuts for something::value, so it seems to me
>> logical to have
>> them all be _v.
>
>
> The _v suffixes in the standard are there to distinguish std::foo from
> std::foo_v, but we don't have that problem.

Wouldn't necessarily hurt to follow the same naming convention idea as
the standard, but sure, we
don't have that problem, agreed.