[PATCH] Allow building GCC with PTX offloading even without CUDA being installed (gcc and nvptx-tools patches)

Alexander Monakov amonakov@ispras.ru
Thu Jan 19 15:10:00 GMT 2017


On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:52:32PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > Sorry for not noticing this earlier, but ...
> > 
> > > +#ifdef __LP64__
> > > +typedef unsigned long long CUdeviceptr;
> > > +#else
> > > +typedef unsigned CUdeviceptr;
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > I think this #ifdef doesn't do the right thing on MinGW.
> > Would it be fine to simplify it?  In my code I have
> > 
> >   typedef uintptr_t CUdeviceptr;
> 
> I think it depends on if we want to use CUdeviceptr typed variables
> in printf like format strings, or C++ overloading (then the exact
> type is significant and we should go for probably
> 
> -#ifdef __LP64__
> +#if defined(__LP64__) || defined(_WIN64)
> 
> (is that the right define for 64-bit MingW, right?).

Yes, _WIN64; libsanitizer has a similar test.  Alternatively, I guess,

  #if __SIZEOF_POINTER__ == 8

> Otherwise, I think using uintptr_t is a problem, because we'd need to
> #include <stdint.h> (the header only includes <stdlib.h>).

Note that plugin-nvptx.c already includes <stdint.h>.  But, anyway, I agree that
there's value in defining the exact type via the #if.

Alexander



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list