[v3 PATCH] PR libstdc++/78389

[Tim Song]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilainen@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch doesn't try to fix the reported sort() issue, because
> a) it would require undoing a throwing move operation, which
> is impossible.
> b) in order to avoid the throwing move, we would need to add a
> level of indirection and the scratch space for the indirect data
> would need to be allocated.

Wait, what throwing move? list::sort should be all splicing and no
moving, unless I missed something.