[PATCH 9d] Don't call delete_tree_ssa for __RTL functions

Richard Biener richard.guenther@gmail.com
Tue Jan 10 13:42:00 GMT 2017


On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>         * final.c (rest_of_clean_state): Don't call delete_tree_ssa for
>         __RTL functions.

Heh, so you are lucky that nothing looks at this.  MEM_EXPRs can
contain SSA names
these days (for points-to info), but I suppose you don't parse
MEM_EXPRs fully yet.

I'm somewhat inclined to tell you calling init_tree_ssa () for __RTL
functions...

Richard.

> ---
>  gcc/final.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/final.c b/gcc/final.c
> index 8a4c9f8..2483381 100644
> --- a/gcc/final.c
> +++ b/gcc/final.c
> @@ -4699,7 +4699,8 @@ rest_of_clean_state (void)
>
>    free_bb_for_insn ();
>
> -  delete_tree_ssa (cfun);
> +  if (cfun->gimple_df)
> +    delete_tree_ssa (cfun);
>
>    /* We can reduce stack alignment on call site only when we are sure that
>       the function body just produced will be actually used in the final
> --
> 1.8.5.3
>



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list