[PATCH 3/5] [AARCH64] Fix part num and implement dependency
James Greenhalgh
james.greenhalgh@arm.com
Mon Oct 31 11:17:00 GMT 2016
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:37:22PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com> wrote:
> >
> > The way the current code was written assumes all cores have an unique part
> > num which is not true. What they have is an unique pair of implementer and
> > part num. This changes the code to look up that pair after the parsing
> > of the two is done.
> >
> > Someone should test this on a big.little target too just to make sure
> > the parsing is done correctly as I don't have access to one off hand.
> >
> > OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
>
>
> Here is an updated version of this patch after the other patches have
> now gone in.
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions
> and -mcpu=native still works.
OK.
The logic in this file looks a bit upside down in places. I might have a go
at refactoring it at some point in stage 3 or 4, but that's no reason to
block this patch for now.
Thanks,
James
> Index: config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c (revision 241437)
> +++ config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c (working copy)
> @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ host_detect_local_cpu (int argc, const c
> bool tune = false;
> bool cpu = false;
> unsigned int i = 0;
> - unsigned int core_idx = 0;
> unsigned char imp = INVALID_IMP;
> unsigned int cores[2] = { INVALID_CORE, INVALID_CORE };
> unsigned int n_cores = 0;
> @@ -219,18 +218,13 @@ host_detect_local_cpu (int argc, const c
> if (strstr (buf, "part") != NULL)
> {
> unsigned ccore = parse_field (buf);
> - for (i = 0; aarch64_cpu_data[i].name != NULL; i++)
> - if (ccore == aarch64_cpu_data[i].part_no
> - && !contains_core_p (cores, ccore))
> - {
> - if (n_cores == 2)
> - goto not_found;
> -
> - cores[n_cores++] = ccore;
> - core_idx = i;
> - arch_id = aarch64_cpu_data[i].arch;
> - break;
> - }
> + if (!contains_core_p (cores, ccore))
> + {
> + if (n_cores == 2)
> + goto not_found;
> +
> + cores[n_cores++] = ccore;
> + }
> continue;
> }
> if (!tune && !processed_exts && strstr (buf, "Features") != NULL)
> @@ -276,11 +270,19 @@ host_detect_local_cpu (int argc, const c
> if (n_cores == 0 || n_cores > 2 || imp == INVALID_IMP)
> goto not_found;
>
> - if (arch && !arch_id)
> - goto not_found;
> -
> if (arch)
> {
> + /* Search for one of the cores in the list. */
> + for (i = 0; aarch64_cpu_data[i].name != NULL; i++)
> + if (aarch64_cpu_data[i].implementer_id == imp
> + && contains_core_p (cores, aarch64_cpu_data[i].part_no))
> + {
> + arch_id = aarch64_cpu_data[i].arch;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (!arch_id)
> + goto not_found;
> +
> struct aarch64_arch_driver_info* arch_info = get_arch_from_id (arch_id);
>
> /* We got some arch indentifier that's not in aarch64-arches.def? */
> @@ -312,7 +314,15 @@ host_detect_local_cpu (int argc, const c
> /* The simple, non-big.LITTLE case. */
> else
> {
> - if (aarch64_cpu_data[core_idx].implementer_id != imp)
> + int core_idx = -1;
> + for (i = 0; aarch64_cpu_data[i].name != NULL; i++)
> + if (cores[0] == aarch64_cpu_data[i].part_no
> + && aarch64_cpu_data[i].implementer_id == imp)
> + {
> + core_idx = i;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (core_idx == -1)
> goto not_found;
>
> res = concat ("-m", cpu ? "cpu" : "tune", "=",
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list