[C++ PATCH] Use VAR_P (x) instead of TREE_CODE () == VAR_DECL in C++ FE

Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com
Mon Oct 24 14:31:00 GMT 2016


Hi!

Just a cleanup patch, most of the FE already uses these macros.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2016-10-24  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* cxx-pretty-print.c (pp_cxx_check_constraint): Use VAR_P (x)
	instead of TREE_CODE (x) == VAR_DECL.
	* constraint.cc (get_concept_definition): Likewise.
	(finish_shorthand_constraint): Likewise.
	* init.c (warn_placement_new_too_small): Likewise.
	* cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r): Likewise.

--- gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c.jj	2016-10-07 21:36:47.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/cxx-pretty-print.c	2016-10-24 14:09:57.315489702 +0200
@@ -2788,7 +2788,7 @@ pp_cxx_check_constraint (cxx_pretty_prin
   tree args = CHECK_CONSTR_ARGS (t);
   tree id = build_nt (TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR, tmpl, args);
 
-  if (TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL)
+  if (VAR_P (decl))
     pp->expression (id);
   else if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
     {
--- gcc/cp/constraint.cc.jj	2016-09-26 12:06:41.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/constraint.cc	2016-10-24 14:10:41.185936471 +0200
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ get_variable_initializer (tree var)
 tree
 get_concept_definition (tree decl)
 {
-  if (TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL)
+  if (VAR_P (decl))
     return get_variable_initializer (decl);
   else if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
     return get_returned_expression (decl);
@@ -1286,10 +1286,8 @@ finish_shorthand_constraint (tree decl,
      the constraint an expansion. */
   tree check;
   tree tmpl = DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (con);
-  if (TREE_CODE (con) == VAR_DECL)
-    {
-      check = build_concept_check (tmpl, arg, args);
-    }
+  if (VAR_P (con))
+    check = build_concept_check (tmpl, arg, args);
   else
     {
       tree ovl = build_overload (tmpl, NULL_TREE);
--- gcc/cp/init.c.jj	2016-10-13 10:25:37.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/init.c	2016-10-24 14:09:37.470739956 +0200
@@ -2362,7 +2362,7 @@ warn_placement_new_too_small (tree type,
      to placement new is not checked since it's unknown what it might
      point to.  */
   if (TREE_CODE (oper) == PARM_DECL
-      || TREE_CODE (oper) == VAR_DECL
+      || VAR_P (oper)
       || TREE_CODE (oper) == COMPONENT_REF)
     return;
 
@@ -2435,13 +2435,13 @@ warn_placement_new_too_small (tree type,
     {
       tree op0 = oper;
       while (TREE_CODE (op0 = TREE_OPERAND (op0, 0)) == COMPONENT_REF);
-      if (TREE_CODE (op0) == VAR_DECL)
+      if (VAR_P (op0))
 	var_decl = op0;
       oper = TREE_OPERAND (oper, 1);
     }
 
   if ((addr_expr || !POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (oper)))
-      && (TREE_CODE (oper) == VAR_DECL
+      && (VAR_P (oper)
 	  || TREE_CODE (oper) == FIELD_DECL
 	  || TREE_CODE (oper) == PARM_DECL))
     {
@@ -2455,7 +2455,7 @@ warn_placement_new_too_small (tree type,
       /* Treat members of unions and members of structs uniformly, even
 	 though the size of a member of a union may be viewed as extending
 	 to the end of the union itself (it is by __builtin_object_size).  */
-      if ((TREE_CODE (oper) == VAR_DECL || use_obj_size)
+      if ((VAR_P (oper) || use_obj_size)
 	  && DECL_SIZE_UNIT (oper)
 	  && tree_fits_uhwi_p (DECL_SIZE_UNIT (oper)))
 	{
--- gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c.jj	2016-10-09 13:17:44.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c	2016-10-24 14:10:14.110277911 +0200
@@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ cp_genericize_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk
   else if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == DECL_EXPR)
     {
       tree d = DECL_EXPR_DECL (stmt);
-      if (TREE_CODE (d) == VAR_DECL)
+      if (VAR_P (d))
 	gcc_assert (CP_DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P (d) == DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P (d));
     }
   else if (TREE_CODE (stmt) == OMP_PARALLEL

	Jakub



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list