[C++/66443] deleted ctor and vbase construction

Nathan Sidwell nathan@acm.org
Thu Oct 6 10:26:00 GMT 2016


On 10/05/16 19:49, Jason Merrill wrote:

> But DR 1658 says that B::B is *not* deleted (because A is not a
> potentially constructed subobject).

oo, I'd not noticed that.  It certainly might make things much simpler. 
Essentially a check for ABSTRACT_TYPE_P somewhere in that code.

nathan



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list