[PATCH] Fix PR78306

[Jeff Law]

On 11/29/2016 12:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Balaji added this check explicitly. There should be tests in the testsuite
>> (spawnee_inline, spawner_inline) which exercise that code.
>
> Yes he did, but no, nothing in the testsuite.
I believe the tests are:

c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c
c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawner_inline.c

But as I mentioned, they don't check for proper behaviour


>
> There is _nowhere_ documented _why_ the checks were added.  Why is
> inlining a transform that can do anything bad to a function using
> cilk_spawn?
I know, it's disappointing.  Even the tests mentioned above don't shed 
any real light on the issue.


Jeff