libgomp: Make GCC 5 OpenACC offloading executables work

[Nathan Sidwell]

On 05/11/16 12:02, Thomas Schwinge wrote:

> I conceptually agree to that.  (If we're serious about that, then we can
> remove more code, such as the legacy libgomp entry point itself -- a
> "missing symbol: [...]" is still vaguely better than a SIGSEGV.)  Yet,
> what I fixed here, is just what Jakub and Nathan agreed upon in
> <http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C20150924084034.GC1847%40tucnak.redhat.com%3E>:

Well, that email appears to be from september, and this patch is more complex 
than the linker versioning script I had anticipated.  If it's taken this long to 
create a patch, either it's very hard, or it's not a priority.  Given 6.1 is 
released, it also seems to have failed to catch the train.

nathan