[c++/68475] ICE with fno-exceptions

Nathan Sidwell nathan@acm.org
Thu Mar 31 16:56:00 GMT 2016


On 03/30/16 09:44, Jason Merrill wrote:

> Hmm, I think the use of the flag there was meant to allow leaving the exception
> specification off in some declarations.  I'm open to getting stricter, but I'd
> prefer to make it a pedwarn when !flag_exceptions rather than an error, in which
> case we still need to deal with the mismatch in merge_exception_specifiers.

ok.  Like this?

nathan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 68475.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2637 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20160331/0dfe213a/attachment.bin>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list