[PATCH] Drop excess size used for run time allocated stack variables.

[Dominik Vogt]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:26:03PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/21/2016 03:35 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >What do we do now with the two patches?  At the moment, the
> >functional patch depends on the changes in the cleanup patch, so
> >it cannot be applied on its own.  Options:
> >
> >(with the requested cleanup in the functional patch)
> >
> > 1) Apply both patches as they are now and do further cleanup on
> >    top of it.
> > 2) Rewrite the functional patch so that it applies without the
> >    cleanup patch and commit it now.
> > 3) Look into the suggested cleanup now and adapt the functional
> >    patch to it when its ready.
> >
> >Actually I'd prefer (1) or (2) to just get the functional patch
> >off my desk.  I agree that the cleanup is very useful, but there's
> >not relation between the cleanup and the functional stuff except
> >that they touch the same code.  Having the functional patch
> >applied would simplify further work for me.
> I thought Eric had ack'd the cleanup patch with a comment fix, so
> that can move forward and presumably unblock your functional patch.
> Right?
> 
> So I think the TODO here is for me to fix the comment per Eric's
> review so that you can move forward.  The trick is getting it done
> before I go on PTO at the end of this week :-)

The comment fix is part of the version of the cleanup patch I
posted, but I've removed some more dead code.  I can handle all of
this if I know what to do exactly.

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany