[PATCH] Drop excess size used for run time allocated stack variables.
Jeff Law
law@redhat.com
Tue Jun 21 22:26:00 GMT 2016
On 06/21/2016 03:35 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> What do we do now with the two patches? At the moment, the
> functional patch depends on the changes in the cleanup patch, so
> it cannot be applied on its own. Options:
>
> (with the requested cleanup in the functional patch)
>
> 1) Apply both patches as they are now and do further cleanup on
> top of it.
> 2) Rewrite the functional patch so that it applies without the
> cleanup patch and commit it now.
> 3) Look into the suggested cleanup now and adapt the functional
> patch to it when its ready.
>
> Actually I'd prefer (1) or (2) to just get the functional patch
> off my desk. I agree that the cleanup is very useful, but there's
> not relation between the cleanup and the functional stuff except
> that they touch the same code. Having the functional patch
> applied would simplify further work for me.
I thought Eric had ack'd the cleanup patch with a comment fix, so that
can move forward and presumably unblock your functional patch. Right?
So I think the TODO here is for me to fix the comment per Eric's review
so that you can move forward. The trick is getting it done before I go
on PTO at the end of this week :-)
Jeff
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list