Cilk Plus testsuite needs massive cleanup (PR testsuite/70595)

[Jeff Law]

On 06/14/2016 12:09 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:19:47 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
>> On Apr 29, 2016, at 5:41 AM, Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/gcc/config/darwin.h b/gcc/config/darwin.h
>>> --- a/gcc/config/darwin.h
>>> +++ b/gcc/config/darwin.h
>>> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ extern GTY(()) int darwin_ms_struct;
>>>    %{L*} %(link_libgcc) %o %{fprofile-arcs|fprofile-generate*|coverage:-lgcov} \
>>>    %{fopenacc|fopenmp|%:gt(%{ftree-parallelize-loops=*:%*} 1): \
>>>      %{static|static-libgcc|static-libstdc++|static-libgfortran: libgomp.a%s; : -lgomp } } \
>>> +    %{fcilkplus:%:include(libcilkrts.spec)%(link_cilkrts)}\
>>>    %{fgnu-tm: \
>>>      %{static|static-libgcc|static-libstdc++|static-libgfortran: libitm.a%s; : -litm } } \
>>>    %{!nostdlib:%{!nodefaultlibs:\
>>
>> Ok.
>
> Is it OK to backport this patch to gcc-6-branch?
> I've re-tested it on macOS with gcc 6.
Yes.  This is fine.

jeff