[PATCH] Fix SLP wrong-code with VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (PR tree-optimization/71259)

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:43:37PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > No, why?  This test doesn't test whether the function has been vectorized.
> > It only tests whether it works.
> > And the check_vect () is supposed to exit early if some extra flags were
> > passed by vect.exp (like e.g. on i?86-linux -msse2) and the HW doesn't
> > support those.
> >
> But this makes the tests fails, rather than be unsupported, right?

check_vect is supposed to exit (0) if the HW doesn't support vectorization,
so the test would PASS.

	Jakub