[PATCH 8/9] shrink-wrap: shrink-wrapping for separate concerns
Bernd Schmidt
bschmidt@redhat.com
Tue Jul 19 14:49:00 GMT 2016
On 07/19/2016 04:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> But you need the profile to make even reasonably good decisions.
I'm not worried about making cost decisions: as far as I'm concerned
it's perfectly fine for that. I'm worried about correctness - you can't
validly save registers inside a loop. So IMO there needs to be an
additional cfg-based check that verifies whether the bb where we want to
place parts of the prologue is guaranteed to be executed at most once.
Bernd
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list