[PATCH] S/390: Xfail some tests in insv-[12].c.
Dominik Vogt
vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Jul 19 12:10:00 GMT 2016
The attached patch XFAILs some of the "insv" testcases as
discussed internally. Tested on s390x biarch and s390.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany
-------------- next part --------------
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
* gcc.target/s390/insv-1.c: Xfail some tests.
* gcc.target/s390/insv-2.c: Likewise.
-------------- next part --------------
>From 6cfe287811766e751c5d94834e5314e97c6ab50d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominik Vogt <vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:10:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] S/390: Xfail some tests in insv-[12].c.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-1.c | 9 ++++++++-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-2.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-1.c
index e6c1b8b..8d464f5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-1.c
@@ -108,4 +108,11 @@ foo4c (unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
#endif
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "risbg" 6 } } */
+/* The functions foo3, foo4, foo3b, foo4b no longer use risbg but rosbg instead.
+
+ On s390x, four risbg go away and four new ones appear in other functions ...
+ { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "risbg" 6 { target { s390x-*-* } } } }
+
+ but not on s390.
+ { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "risbg" 2 { target { s390-*-* } } } }
+*/
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-2.c
index 2ba6d6c..70af123 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/insv-2.c
@@ -108,4 +108,17 @@ foo4c (unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
#endif
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "risbgn" 6 } } */
+/* The functions foo3, foo4, foo3b, foo4b no longer use risbgn but rosbg instead
+ which is slightly worse. Combine prefers to use the simpler two insn
+ combinations possible with rosbg instead of the more complicated three insn
+ combinations that result in risbgn. This problem has been introduced with
+ the commit
+
+ S/390: Add patterns for r<nox>sbg instructions.
+
+ (3rd of May, 2016). This should be fixed some time in the future, but for
+ now just adapt the expected result:
+
+ { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "risbgn" 6 { xfail { *-*-* } } } }
+ { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "risbgn" 2 } }
+*/
--
2.3.0
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list