[PATCH] Amend dump expectation in slsr-8.c (PR, tree-optimization/71490)

[Martin Liška]

On 07/13/2016 07:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> Isn't that a code quality regression?  So instead shouldn't we be keeping the same expectation, but xfailing the test?
> 
> jeff

Hello.

Disabling a pass before slsr makes the test to catch both opportunities.
Is the patch fine?

Thanks,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Amend-dump-expectation-in-slsr-8.c-PR-tree-optimizat-v2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 936 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20160714/01f8d468/attachment.bin>