[PATCH 2/2] Optimize fortran loops with +-1 step.
Richard Biener
richard.guenther@gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 10:08:00 GMT 2016
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> marxin <mliska@suse.cz> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90
>> index ea3990d..2030328 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90
>> @@ -32,4 +32,4 @@ end Subroutine PADEC
>> ! There are 5 legal partitions in this code. Based on the data
>> ! locality heuristic, this loop should not be split.
>>
>> -! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "distributed: split to" "ldist" } }
>> +! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "distributed: split to" "ldist" } }
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90 -O scan-tree-dump ldist "distributed: split to"
That change is certainly spurious (not in ChangeLog) and bogus given the
comment before the scan.
Richard.
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list