Wonly-top-basic-asm

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:11:36PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 01:29 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> 
> >In my opinion we should not warn for any asm that means the same both
> >as basic and as extended asm.  The problem then becomes, what *is* the
> >meaning of a basic asm, what does it clobber.
> 
> I think this may be too hard to figure out in general without parsing 
> the asm string, which we don't really want to do.

That depends on the semantics of basic asm.  With the currently implemented
semantics, it is trivial.


Segher