[PATCH] PR target/68991: Add vector_memory_operand and "Bm" constraint

Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com
Mon Jan 4 08:22:00 GMT 2016


On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 07:11:58PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
> @@ -951,6 +951,13 @@
>         (match_test "INTEGRAL_MODE_P (GET_MODE (op))")
>         (match_test "op == CONSTM1_RTX (GET_MODE (op))")))
>  
> +; Return true when OP is operand acceptable for vector memory operand.
> +; Only AVX can have misaligned memory operand.
> +(define_predicate "vector_memory_operand"
> +  (and (match_operand 0 "memory_operand")
> +       (ior (match_test "TARGET_AVX")
> +	    (match_test "MEM_ALIGN (op) >= GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (mode)"))))

Shouldn't this take into account the ssememalign attribute too?
I mean, various instructions have some ssememalign > 8, which means they
can't accept any alignment, but happily accept say >= 32-bit alignment
or >= 64-bit alignment.  Though, ssememalign is an instruction attribute
and the predicates/constraints don't have access to the current instruction.
So maybe we need more constraints and more predicates, the ones you've added
for ssememalign == 0 instructions, don't change anything in instructions
with ssememalign == 8 (you've clearly changed some of them, and patch 3
shows you've tried to partially undo it afterwards, but only the constraint,
not the predicate, and only in one instruction), and use different
predicates/constraints for ssememalign == {16,32,64} instructions.

	Jakub



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list