[PATCH][AArch64] Replace insn to zero up DF register
Evandro Menezes
e.menezes@samsung.com
Fri Feb 26 22:43:00 GMT 2016
On 02/26/16 06:37, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Evandro Menezes <e.menezes@samsung.com> wrote:
>> I have a question though: is it necessary to add the "fp" and "simd"
>> attributes to both movsf_aarch64 and movdf_aarch64 as well?
> You need at least the "simd" attribute, but providing "fp" as well is clearer
> (in principle the TARGET_FLOAT check in the pattern condition is
> redundant as a result, but the movhf and movtf patterns already do both).
>
> Also you want to use the smallest possible SIMD size as these are
> scalar operations and some microarchitectures execute 64-bit operations
> more efficiently than 128-bit ones, so:
>
> mov\\t%0.h[0], %w1
> + movi\\t%0.4h, #0
> umov\\t%w0, %1.h[0]
>
> fmov\\t%s0, %w1
> + movi\\t%0.2s, #0
> fmov\\t%w0, %s1
>
> With those changes it should be ready for commit once you get the OK from James/Marcus.
Replace insn to zero up SIMD registers
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md
(*movhf_aarch64): Add "movi %0, #0" to zero up register.
(*movsf_aarch64): Likewise and add "simd" and "fp" attributes.
(*movdf_aarch64): Likewise.
Please, verify the new "simd" and "fp" attributes for SF and DF.
Thank you,
--
Evandro Menezes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Replace-insn-to-zero-up-SIMD-registers.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3771 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20160226/70a26275/attachment.bin>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list